Legal Opinion

Heckard v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 22, 1998No. 78,429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gernon, J.:

In this landlord-tenant dispute, Robert W. Heckard, the landlord, appeals from the amount of damages awarded to him.

Heckard filed a pro se brief. Andrew and Stacy Martin, the tenants, filed no brief at all. The parties apparently had a written lease agreement which was admitted before the trial court. However, the lease was not included in the record on appeal.

The Martins rented a duplex from Heckard and paid their rent on a timely basis for over 2 years. They stopped payment on a rental check in protest because Heckard had not fixed various problems in the duplex which they had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  2. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. State v. GadelkarimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. State v. GradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Tufts v. Newmar Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  5. Griffin v. Security Pacific Automotive Financial Services Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API