State v. Joseph Diorio (069597)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Judge CUFF
(temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court.
In 1999, Joseph Diorio and two others conceived and executed a “bust-out” financial scheme by creating a business for the purpose of defrauding creditors. In a bust-out scheme, a company is formed and establishes a credit line presenting itself to the business community as a reputable company. Initially, it places small orders with suppliers. As it establishes a favorable payment history, the company’s credit limit is increased. Once the company’s suppliers are satisfied that the company has established a reputation for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- United States v. Alberto ParamoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Eddie TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State v. TwiggsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- State of New Jersey v. James E. Jones and LikishaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- State v. BernardiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. GREGORY P. COBBS (13-07-0893, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.