Legal Opinion

United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Meza-Corrales, United States of America v. Ramon Lamark Bridges,defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1999No. 98-10341, 98-10342PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:, Francisco Meza-Corrales (“Meza-Cor-rales”) appeals his jury conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess and possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), respectively. Ramon La-mark Bridges (“Bridges”) appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm and ammunition after having been convicted of a criminal offense punishable by a term of imprisonment greater than one year, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s decision as to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Washington v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Tuan Van Tran v. Gary Lindsey, Warden Salinas Valley State Prisons State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. BasherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Herman Patayan SorianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. David Luther Ghent v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Mielewczyk v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API