Isbell v. Ed Ball Const. Co., Inc.

David Newbern, Justice.

This is a contract case which was appealed to this Court as one involving statutory interpretation. Rule 29.1.C. We have retained the case for decision although we find no need to interpret a statute.

The appellant, Jimmy Isbell, sued the appellees, Ed Ball Construction Co., Inc., and Commercial Union Insurance Co. for breach of contract. The jury verdict favored the appellees. Isbell contends the Trial Court erred in granting, in part, a motion in limine by which Isbell was prevented from introducing into evidence a separate contract between the parties. He also…