Legal Opinion

P.A.M. Transport, Inc. v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 10, 1994No. 93-59PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is an insurance contract case. The appellant, P.A.M. Transport, Inc. (PAM), entered a contract with the appellee, Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS), which provided that BCBS would administer the health care claims of PAM employees. BCBS was to adjust and then pay all claims submitted by PAM employees. BCBS would then bill PAM, monthly, for reimbursement of the claims plus an administrative fee. The agreement provided PAM’s annual liability for insurance claims would not exceed a “cap.” The cap was calculated using a formula based on the number of employees…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Crossett v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Minerva Enterprises, Inc. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Delta School of Commerce, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Anthony v. First National Bank of MagnoliaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Goforth v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. South County, Inc. v. First Western Loan Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Seeco, Inc. v. HalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Smith v. HansenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Nursing Home Consultants, Inc. v. Quantum Health Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API