Legal Opinion

Pustejovsky v. Lodge

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1935No. Application No. 20,969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge TAYLOR delivered

the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

This case is before us on application for writ of error. We have concluded, after a careful consideration of the record, that the application should be denied. In view of the importance of the question presented we deem it advisable to supplement by written statement and additional authorities the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. 78 S. W. (2d) 732.

The court predicates its decision on the following' quotation from Thomas v. Bank, 127 S. W., 844:

“When a purchaser who seeks to buy land has examined the records of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moran v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Rogers v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Traders' Nat. Bank v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Wood v. SparksTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of HicoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Ragan v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. McCarty v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Steele v. OrtsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API