Legal Opinion

Ragan v. Day

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1936No. 4599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The parties to this appeal will be designated as in the trial court.

Plaintiff sued defendants, Elizabeth Day, a feme sole, and M. H. Burum, to foreclose a vendor’s and deed of trust lien on 200 acres of land in Deaf Smith county, Tex. The pleadings below sufficiently raised the legal issue which we decide. Trial was before the court, and judgment was for defendants.

The material facts are: On June 2, 1926, Elizabeth Day and husband conveyed to Carl P. Owen the 200 acres of land in controversy. This deed as part of the consideration for said land recited the execution and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moran v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Rogers v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Pustejovsky v. LodgeTexas Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCarty v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Steele v. OrtsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API