Legal Opinion
Jesus Padilla Enriquez, Raul Franco v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 1961No. 17276PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants were indicted in three counts (III, IV and VII) of a se.ven count indictment. Count III charged each with sale and Count IV the concealment of certain narcotics, each in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 and each occurring on August 2, 1960. Count VII charged each defendant and others with a conspiracy to sell and conceal the same narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. The central figure in all seven counts was one Rosalio Hernandez Trigueros, Jr. In the conspiracy count it alleged the object thereof was that Trigueros would arrange to transfer heroin to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. MantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Blitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Iva Ikuko Toguri D'Aquino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- George Kohatsu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Esco Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Jerome Kenneth Mack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Jesus Padilla Enriquez and Raul Franco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.