Legal Opinion
Jesus Padilla Enriquez and Raul Franco v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1963No. 17928_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This is the second appeal before us in the above entitled matter.
Originally there were seven defendants charged in a seven count indictment. Defendants Enriquez and Franco were charged in Count III with sale and in Count IV with the concealment and transportation, or facilitating the concealment or transportation, of narcotics; and in Count VII were charged with other defendants of a conspiracy to sell and conceal the same narcotics. (21 U.S.C. § 174.) As we noted in our previous opinion (9 Cir., 293 F.2d 788), the central figure, one Trigueros, was charged in all seven…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Nicholas A. StironeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- James Leroy Teasley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Fernando Vizcarra-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Elmer J. HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Alvin JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.