Legal Opinion

Newhall v. Enterprise Mining Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1910PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

One Woodin was the promoter, the treasurer and a director of the defendant mining corporation, whose capital stock was ten thousand shares, of a par-value of $100 each. Of these shares ninety-three hundred and ninety-one had been issued to Woodin in payment for his interest in certain mines, nine shares had been issued to other corporators, and six hundred shares were not issued nor subscribed for. Woodin conveyed one thousand of his shares to one Prince as a trustee for the corporation, under a stipulation, agreed to by the board of directors, that he, Woodin, should be appointed the fiscal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foye v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity v. PufferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Harlow v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Allen v. StorerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sandler v. SilkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Mackintosh v. ChambersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API