Legal Opinion

(PC) Rodriguez v. Agostini

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 4, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01565Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, No. 1: 18-cv-01565-DAD-JLT 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 v. RECONSIDERATION, VACATING ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 14 AGOSTINI, et al., RECOMMENDATIONS AND JUDGMENT ENTERED ON AUGUST 2, 2019, AND 15 Defendants. PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OBJECTIONS WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS 16 (Doc. No. 11) 17 18 Plaintiff Pedro Rodriguez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On April 29, 2019, the assigned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Amsat Cable Ltd. v. Cablevision of Connecticut Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API