Legal Opinion

Burke Robinson v. D. Flores, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 29, 2026No. 1:26-cv-01609Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BURKE ROBINSON, Case No. 1:26-cv-1609BAM (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO 12 v. ACTION 13 D. FLORES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN 14 Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS 15 (ECF No. 7) 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Burke Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s 20 complaint, and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API