Johns-Manville Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Plaintiffs Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation (collectively referred to as “Johns-Manville”) filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Order and To Alter Judgment. The motion stems from an order of September 28, 1988, dismissing Johns-Manville’s complaints in Nos. 465-83G, 688-83C, & 1-84C for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and awarding costs to defendant. Johns-Manville was ordered to pay defendant, as the prevailing party, all costs incurred in the proceedings before the trial court. The principal issue raised by Johns-Manville’s motion…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Graham v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992