Legal Opinion

Johns-Manville Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 10, 1989No. Nos. 465-83C, 688-83C and 1-84CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

Plaintiffs Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation (collectively referred to as “Johns-Manville”) filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Order and To Alter Judgment. The motion stems from an order of September 28, 1988, dismissing Johns-Manville’s complaints in Nos. 465-83G, 688-83C, & 1-84C for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and awarding costs to defendant. Johns-Manville was ordered to pay defendant, as the prevailing party, all costs incurred in the proceedings before the trial court. The principal issue raised by Johns-Manville’s motion…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Graham v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API