Legal Opinion
Caruso v. New York City Police Department Pension Funds
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
Motions numbered 108 of January 11, 1982 and 174 of November 10, 1981 are consolidated for disposition.
In each, defendant City of New York moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) to dismiss the complaint upon the grounds plaintiffs have failed to state a cause of action for counsel fees and expenses in connection with prior Heart Bill litigation.
In 1979, a controversy arose among the city members and union members of the Board of Trustees (Board) of the Fire Department Pension Fund (F.D. Fund) and also among the respective members of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Seif v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Matter of City of New York v. SchoeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Barr v. WackmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Doyle v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Cahn v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caruso v. New York City Police Department Pension FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Mercurio v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Caruso v. New York City Police Department Pension FundsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988