Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. McQuaide

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for a receiver pendente lite in an action of foreclosure.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, and motion is made for a receiver of the' rents and profits pendente lite. The motion is based entirely on a clause in the mortgage providing for such a remedy,' no allegation being made as to the sufficiency or insufficiency of the security. On authority this motion must be denied. Sickles v. Canary, 8 App. Div. 308; Brick v. Hornbeck, 19 Misc. Rep. 218; Degener v. Stiles, 25 N. Y. St. Repr. 422. But apart from precedents, I think the results should .be the same. The remedy by receiver is sui generis, and an outgroiyth of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brick v. HornbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Sickles v. CanaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. BroekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Mortgage Union of Penn. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API