Legal Opinion

Benjamin Stewart v. Farnham Fiber Optics, LLC, and Steven C. Farnham

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided August 6, 2026No. 2:22-cv-02431Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) BENJAMIN STEWART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) No. 2:22-cv-02431-SHM/atc ) FARNHAM FIBER OPTICS, LLC, ) AND STEVEN C. FARNHAM, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Before the Court is Plaintiff Benjamin Stewart’s Motion for Default Judgment (the "Motion”). (ECF No. 51). For the reasons that follow, the Motion is GRANTED. I. Background On July 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant Farnham Fiber Optics, LLC (“Farnham Fiber Optics”) and Defendant Steven Farnham (“Farnham”)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc. And Jared SchubinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Theresa Waldo v. Consumers Energy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Wendy Elwell, Plaintiff-Appellee v. University Hospitals Home Care Services, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API