State v. Ingalls
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court. Indictment for nuisance. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
"WRIGHT, Ch, J.
1. Grand jury: Objection to. I. Appellants urge certain objections to the selection and impanneling of the grand jury. They were held to answer for a public offense within the meaning of § 4611 of the Revision, and their objections were interposed after the indictment was found. The excuse for not making it before is found in an affidavit that defendants were ignorant of the alleged irregularities or defects.
The Revision, like the Code of 1857, declares that an objection to the grand jury, or an individual juror, cannot be interposed by a defendant, for any cause of challenge,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bean v. Barney, Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
3Cited by13 opinions
- Craven v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
- City of Emporia v. VolmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Ex parte N. K. Fairbank Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1912
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Fooshee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.