Legal Opinion

Muller v. Swanton

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1911No. Civ. No. 534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of. the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order denying a new trial. .Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts.are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant F. W. Swanton, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. A former judgment in the same action in favor of said defendant was reversed by the supreme court. (Muller v. Swanton, 140 Cal. 249, [73 Pac. 994].) The action is on a promissory note for $1,222, which was executed by the defendant to W. B. Fonville and indorsed by Fonville to the New York Life Insurance Company and by it in turn indorsed to the plaintiff merely for the purpose of collection. The answer does not deny the due execution of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Muller v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Taylor v. DarlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Whitney v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API