Legal Opinion

Kush v. Wentworth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 2003No. 2-01-0877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Plaintiff sued defendant seeking to recover damages for injuries that she suffered when defendant’s horse kicked her while plaintiff and defendant were participating in a group horse ride. As amended, plaintiffs complaint contained three counts alleging, respectively, that defendant violated the Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5/1 et seq. (West 2000)), that defendant was negligent, and that defendant’s conduct was willful and wanton. Based on its ruling that the Equine Activity Liability Act (Act) (745 ILCS 47/1 et seq. (West 2000)) barred the first two counts of the complaint on their faces and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. MargulisIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. SwiftIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. EllisIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Carl v. ResnickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Gautreau v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. LaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. High v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Perkinson v. CoursonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  4. Perkinson v. CoursonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. Christie v. ForeckiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API