Leal v. City of Rosenberg
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
BRIAN QUINN, Justice.
Pending before the Court is the motion of the City of Rosenberg (City) to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is allegedly non-existent because the motion for new trial filed by appellant Mary L. Leal (Leal) purportedly failed to extend the period within which to perfect her appeal. Furthermore, the motion for new trial allegedly failed to extend the period because it was filed in the wrong cause or assigned the wrong cause number. We deny the motion.
According to the record, the summary judgment from which appeal was taken was originally entered in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Philbrook v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Mueller v. SaraviaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Blankenship v. RobinsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Matlock v. McCormick, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
3Cited by20 opinions
- Paselk v. Rabun, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Tanner v. Karnavas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Health Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Nolen, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Carol Paselk and Myrle Reynolds v. David and Pat Rabun, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Carol Paselk and Myrle Reynolds v. David and Pat Rabun, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.