Legal Opinion
Chumley v. Climate Master, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 1999No. 91,836PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADAMS, Judge:
¶ 1 This review of a Form 19 proceeding poses the question of when the statute of limitations began to run on Petitioner’s claim for payment of his bill for medical services rendered to Claimant James R. Heitzler. At hearing before the Workers’ Compensation Court, both parties argued Fortenbacher v. Guardsmark, Inc., 1993 OK CIV APP 194, C, 867 P.2d 487, controlled, but they differed on how the principles enunciated in that case applied to the facts of this matter. The Workers’ Compensation Court concluded that the limitations period began to run on December 1, 1994, when…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Oklahoma Brick Corporation v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Sherwood Forest No. 2 Corp. v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Romero v. Workers' Compensation Court, CCB, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Fortenbacher v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roberts v. University of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003