Wasserman v. Autohaus on Edens, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi
Leonard Wasserman (Wasserman), plaintiff-appellant, is appealing orders finding that (1) he did not become and is not a stockholder of Autohaus On Edens, Inc. (Autohaus), and (2) awarding him $36,043.84, the return of his investment plus statutory interest. On appeal, Wasserman argues that (1) the trial court’s finding that he is not a shareholder is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and (2) the trial court erroneously shifted to him the burden of proving the absence of a condition precedent to the Autohaus shareholder agreement. Alternatively, Wasserman argues that the judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beverly Bank v. Alsip BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Wysocki v. BedrosianAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Barrows v. MacO, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- F. E. Holmes & Son Construction Co. v. Gualdoni Electric Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Grill v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Vitkus v. Beatrice Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- John Gould v. Artisoft, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Hardin, Rodriguez & Boivin Anesthesiologists, Ltd. v. Paradigm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Herwig v. Dixon National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Grot v. First Bank of SchaumburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.