Legal Opinion

McKim v. Roosa

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 17, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an faction originally brought against an executor and his sureties on a probate bond which was put in suit under Pub. Sts. c. 143, § 10, now R. L. c. 149, § 20, by a creditor who had recovered judgment against the executor and had made an ineffectual demand on him to pay the same or show sufficient goods to be taken on execution. A little more than three months after this action was brought, the Probate Court, on representation of the executor, made a decree under what is now R. L. c. 142, § 2, that the estate would probably be insufficient for the payment of the debts of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cabell v. Cabell's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  2. Fuller v. ConnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Coleman v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harmon v. SweetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Chamberlain v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Grant v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. McIntire v. ConlanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Campbell v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API