McKim v. Roosa
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
This is an faction originally brought against an executor and his sureties on a probate bond which was put in suit under Pub. Sts. c. 143, § 10, now R. L. c. 149, § 20, by a creditor who had recovered judgment against the executor and had made an ineffectual demand on him to pay the same or show sufficient goods to be taken on execution. A little more than three months after this action was brought, the Probate Court, on representation of the executor, made a decree under what is now R. L. c. 142, § 2, that the estate would probably be insufficient for the payment of the debts of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cabell v. Cabell's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Fuller v. ConnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Coleman v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harmon v. SweetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Chamberlain v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Grant v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- McIntire v. ConlanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Campbell v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.