Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. City of Reidsville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1998No. COA97-984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

We first consider whether the property descriptions in the annexation ordinances are metes and bounds descriptions where the property descriptions do not include courses and distances but make reference to “lots” that are not identified in the property descriptions.

Petitioners argue that the annexation statute expressly requires that in the annexation ordinance “[t]he external boundaries of the area to be annexed shall be described by metes and bounds.” G.S. 160A-49(e)(l). Petitioners first contend that the descriptions of the six annexation areas fail to comply with this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thrash v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Lowe v. Town of MebaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Weeks v. Town of CoatsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. American Greetings Corp. v. Town of Alexander MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashley v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API