Legal Opinion

State v. Hemphill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1991No. 9029SC791Published

1Opinion of the Court

409 S.E.2d 744 (1991)

104 N.C. App. 431

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Stephen Andre HEMPHILL.

No. 9029SC791.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 5, 1991.

Attorney General Lacy H. Thornburg by Asst. Atty. Gen., John F. Maddrey, Raleigh, for the State.

Horton and Horton by Shelby E. Horton, Asheville, for defendant, appellant.

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant's one assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charge of second degree murder. He argues that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of the element of malice.

In State v. Wilkerson, 295…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. VauseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. MizeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. EarnestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API