Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 20, 2004No. 1D03-1843Published

1Per curiam

Appellant argues the trial court erred in declaring appellant to be a sex offender and rejecting his argument that section 943.0435, Florida Statutes (1998), which requires the registration of “sex offenders,” is unconstitutional on the ground that it denies procedural due process. Appellant’s argument is without merit. We have recently rejected the same constitutional challenge both under section 943.0435, see Ames v. State, 870 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), and under section 775.21, The Florida Sexual Predator Act. See Frazier v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D369, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 221043…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Ames v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API