Frazier v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Concluding that section 775.21, Florida Statutes, the Florida Sexual Predators Act, does not deny procedural due process under the Florida Constitution, we affirm the order under review. See Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Givens v. State, 851 So.2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with the decision in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
ALLEN, KAHN and POLSTON, JJ„ concur.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Espindola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Milks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Givens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rickman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Black v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Metaxotos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Sigler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.