Legal Opinion

State v. Geraw

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 2002No. 00-459PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The question presented is whether Vermont citizens must accept the risk that police interviews in the privacy of their home are being secretly recorded without the protection of a judicially authorized warrant. We conclude that Chapter I, Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution prohibits such secret recording. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Chittenden District Court granting defendant’s motion to suppress.

The material facts are few and undisputed. On April 17,2000, two police detectives interviewed defendant at his residence in Essex Junction. The detectives were investigating an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. BauderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. State v. MullensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Appeal of Application for Search WarrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. State v. RheaumeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API