Legal Opinion

United States v. Chow

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 22, 2010No. 7:09-cr-00165PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:

This matter is before the Court on the Government’s request for restitution, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2259, on behalf of “Amy” and “Vicky,” who are two of the children depicted in child pornography found in Defendant Jason Chow’s (“Defendant”) computer and files. 1 For the reasons that follow, the request for restitution is denied.

I. Background

Defendant was originally indicted on February 24, 2009, for attempting to receive child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2)(B) and (b)(1). (Gov’t Sentencing Ltr. to the Ct. dated June…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. MorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. C.R.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. HagermanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
  4. United States v. LundquistDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
  5. Nolan Deeds v. City of Cedar Rapids, St. Luke's Work Well Solutions, St. Luke's Healthcare, and Iowa Health System D/B/A Unitypoint HealthCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API