Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Filipiak

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1953No. 28,897Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Gilkison, J.

I am in dissent with the majority opinion. It fails to note both the facts of the case and the law applicable thereto, for the bench, bar and the public. For that reason it becomes necessary for me to supply the same at some length, in order to give the *423causes which I think should govern our decision and ■therefore the reasons for my dissent. They are as follows:

On March 5, 1952, the Disciplinary Commission, created agreeable with Rule 3-21 of this court, filed its properly verified information in triplicate in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Yaselli v. GoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API