Legal Opinion

Nuckolls v. Mantooth

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1961No. 5-2392 & 5-2393PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

These two appeals were consolidated in this court. The principal case is a partition suit in which the main question is that of determining the exact proportion in which the parties own two adjoining 120-acre tracts as tenants in common. In that appeal the two appellants, Joe and Bill Nuckolls, contend that the chancellor erred in awarding each of them only an undivided two-ninths interest in each tract. The other appeal, from the probate court, involves a distribution of accrued rent and will be governed by the decision in the chancery case.

The facts are not simple. The parties’ common…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yuscavage v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Hutchison v. SheppardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Stegall v. BughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Weatherly v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HurdleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Dickson v. RenfroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Dickson v. RenfroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Fletcher v. HurdleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API