Legal Opinion
United States v. Klaw
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1964No. 63 Cr. 580PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
After careful study, I have concluded that the motion of defendants to suppress evidence (Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e)) must be denied.
On June 27, 1963, an indictment of the two defendants was returned. There are 85 counts, the first charging both defendants with conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1461 — mailing obscene, etc. matter. The other counts charge Klaw alone with the substantive offense of mailing obscene, etc. matter in violation of 18 U.S. C. § 1461. Pleas of not guilty have been entered.
After return of the indictment, warrants were immediately issued for the arrest of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Edward A. Wild, Jr. And Louis CorradoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. Pardo-BollandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- United States v. Edward A. Wild, Jr. And Louis CorradoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970