Legal Opinion

Syvertson v. Malaktaris

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2000No. 20000146PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1 Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Charles E. Syvertson appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint under Rule 12(b), N.D.R.Civ.P. This Court reviews an appeal from a Rule 12(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., dismissal in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, taking as true the allegations in the complaint. Burke v. North Dakota Dep't of Corrections andRehabilitation, 2000 ND 85, ¶ 4, 609 N.W.2d 729. Under Rule 35.1(a)(6), N.D.R.App.P., we summarily affirm the trial court's judgment.

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDEWALLE, C.J.

MARY MUEHLEN MARING

WILLIAM…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burke v. North Dakota Department of Corrections & RehabilitationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matrix Properties Corp. v. TAG INVESTMENTSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GaraasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Matrix v. TAG InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jacobson v. GaraasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Intel-Foods Corporation v. AlexanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API