Jacobson v. Garaas
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] Jonathan T. Garaas and Disciplinary Counsel have both petitioned for re*920view of a hearing panel’s report and order of reprimand, which found Garaas had violated the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct and ordered that Garaas be publicly reprimanded and pay costs of the disciplinary proceeding. We conclude Ga-raas has violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 3.5(a), 3.5(b), and 8.4(e), and we order that he be publicly reprimanded and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $7,312.42.
I
[¶ 2] Garaas has represented TAG Investments in lengthy and contentious litigation with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berner v. DelahantyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Timothy T. Ryan, Jr. v. County of Dupage, and Sheriff Richard P. Doria and Deputy Sheriff Miller, Individually and in Their Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GaraasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Brian Philip Manookian v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2024