Legal Opinion · Dissent

82-10 Roosevelt Avenue, Inc. v. Sachs

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 24, 1950Published

1DissentColden, J.

I dissent in part from the determination arrived at by the majority. I vote to affirm the final-order dismissing the landlord’s petition on the merits. I agree that the judgment in favor of the tenants on their counterclaim should be reversed and a new trial ordered which should be limited entirely, however, to a consideration of the said counterclaim.

The purported reasonable rent agreement was a mere sham and a patent flagrant attempt to circumvent the emergency rent legislation. The law intends that a reasonable rent may be acceded to by a tenant with respect to his own occupancy. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeVita v. PianisaniAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
  2. Milella v. SimpsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  3. Wilbisky v. German Alliance InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
  4. Epstein v. KaplanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  5. Schollars v. CoghlanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API