Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 15, 1928No. 6687PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. Declarations of a witness, after trial, at variance with liis sworn testimony, even when made under oath, and explicitly asserting that his testimony on the trial was false, do not constitute cause for grant of a new trial. Clark v. State, 117 Ga. 254 (8) (43 S. E. 853) ; Jordan v. State, 124 Ga. 417 (52 S. E. 768) ; Smith v. State, 148 Ga. 322 (2) (96 S. E. 632); Johnson v. State, 149 Ga. 214 (99 S. E. 609); Wilson v. State, 15 Ga. App. 632 (84 S. E. 81) ; Morgan v. State, 16 Ga. App. 559 (85 S. E. 827).

(а) Much less will proof of declarations made by a witness for the State, at variance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Coggeshall v. ParkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. McKie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Home Insurance v. LoflinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API