Moore v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stern,
Three policies of insurance upon the life of Job .W. Moore were issued by Prudential Insurance Company of America, in each of which his wife, Rosella Moore, was named as beneficiary. The right to change the beneficiary was reserved by the insured; should the beneficiary not survive the insured, the amount due under the policies was to be paid to the insured’s executors, administrators or assigns.
Rosella Moore shot and killed her husband, pleaded guilty to a charge of voluntary manslaughter, and is now serving a sentence for the crime. She brought this suit to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Tarlo's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Carpenter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Tamaqua Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Greifer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fisher v. DyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Burns v. Goldberg (Malamut, Third Party Defendant). Appeal of Malamut. Appeal of GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Larsen v. First BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Stafford v. Roadway Transit Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Strickland v. WysowatckySupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.