Legal Opinion

Howard v. Hess

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Debt on bond. Plaintiff brings error. The iacts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

This was a suit upon what was claimed by plaintiff to be a stay bond to prevent execution during writ of error. The questions all arise on the finding.

■ The court below found that a writ of error was issued from this Court to the circuit court for the county of Saginaw upon a judgment in favor of Howard against Hess. This writ was sent to Mr. Holden, the attorney for Hess, who pro*726cured the bond in question, and submitted it for the inspection of plaintiff's attorney to see if he would be satisfied with-it. By some means which the court was. unable to find, this-bond got into the county…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Healy v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Timmerman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Eby v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Hollenbeck v. BreakeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Walter v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API