Howard v. Hess
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Debt on bond. Plaintiff brings error. The iacts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
This was a suit upon what was claimed by plaintiff to be a stay bond to prevent execution during writ of error. The questions all arise on the finding.
■ The court below found that a writ of error was issued from this Court to the circuit court for the county of Saginaw upon a judgment in favor of Howard against Hess. This writ was sent to Mr. Holden, the attorney for Hess, who pro*726cured the bond in question, and submitted it for the inspection of plaintiff's attorney to see if he would be satisfied with-it. By some means which the court was. unable to find, this-bond got into the county…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Healy v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Timmerman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Eby v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Hollenbeck v. BreakeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Walter v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928