Augusta & Savannah Railroad v. Lark
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Eve. City court of Bichmond county. May term, 1895.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
The question presented in this case was decided in that of Constitution Publishing Co. v. Stegall, during the present term. Ante, 405. It is really too plain for argument. Nothing outside of the declaration itself can properly be looked to or considered in testing its legal sufficiency. Of course, exhibits to a declaration are to be treated as parts of it; but an agreed statement of facts, though the same might be all that was needed in disposing of a motion for a non-*801suit, cannot possibly throw any light upon the question as to whether or not the allegations of the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hicks v. BeachamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Burke v. Life Insurance Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Roles v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Pattillo v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Rembert v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.