Legal Opinion

Rembert v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1941No. 13856PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

A preliminary question is presented. The sole exception is to the sustaining of a demurrer to the petition. The judge’s order recites that on the hearing it was agreed by counsel “that plaintiff’s case would turn on the validity or invalidity of the foreclosure proceedings as recorded in the case of Reconstruction Finance Corporation vs. Mrs. H. L. Bowden, No. 108914 in this court. And it was agreed that the court might consider, on the demurrer, the foreclosure proceedings referred to;” and a copy of the proceedings in said case No. 108914 is attached to the bill of exceptions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Irons v. American National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Talbotton Creamery & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Constitution Publishing Co. v. StegallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Buchan v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Mitchell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koehn v. Union Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Holcombe v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Burke v. Life Insurance Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Woodside v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. I. Perlis & Sons v. Peacock Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API