Legal Opinion
Shah v. Shah
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 9, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
KESTIN, P.J.A.D.
On August 22, 2003, plaintiff, Gayatri Shah, filed a complaint seeking relief under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1991 (the Act), N.J.S.A. 20:25-17 to -35. Following the entry of a temporary restraining order (TRO), defendant, Mayank Shah, moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the person. The trial court denied that motion.
In the meantime, in an amended TRO, the court had continued the restraints previously imposed on defendant, and had ordered defendant, by way of temporary support, to pay plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- J. W. Sparks & Co. v. GallosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shah v. ShahSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005