Legal Opinion

In Re Biopure Corp. Derivative Litigation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 28, 2006No. CIV.A.04-10177 NGPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GERTNER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This shareholder derivative class action alleges that defendant Biopure and seven officers and/or directors breached their fiduciary duties and otherwise mismanaged the company by concealing negative information about the development and prospects for Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval of Hemopure, the company’s principal product. 1

Before me are defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint [# 20] and plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint [# 29]. I have also agreed to read the defendants’ Opposition to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. In Re Abbott Laboratories Derivative Shareholders LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. In Re Keyspan Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. Reding v. Goldman Sachs & Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Willa Rosenbloom v. David PyottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. In Re Pfizer Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Sherman v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. In Re Forest Laboratories, Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Connolly v. Gasmire, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API