Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 1, 1926No. 236PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Of the evidence herein it is enough to say that there was testimony that Steinberg had said that during 1921 he did acquire more money by dealing in illicit liquor than the amount which he reported as his income for that year; but there was no evidence sufficient to go to the jury tending to show that he had received any particular or specified number of dollars as such gains. As for the charge that during the year 1921 his “net ineome * * * was a certain amount, to wit, the sum of $760,635.43,” had the indictment been a complaint for that sum, plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Unemployment Compensation Com. v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Burroughs Bldg. Material Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- National City Bank of New York v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- In Re Mid America Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1939
- United States Ex Rel. Starr v. MulliganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.