Legal Opinion
Shube v. Cheng
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marvin E. Segal, J.
Motion by the defendant Citibank, N.A. (hereafter Citibank) for an order pursuant to CPLR 3212 granting summary judgment dismissing the amended verified complaint as against said defendant on the ground that there is no material issue of fact.
In September 1989, Daniel and Ruth Shube entered into a contract for the purchase of the premises located at 28 Harold Road, Plainview, from Philip Yen-Po Cheng and Tami Tsa Chen-I Cheng, for $195,000. On February 16, 1990, the Shubes attended the closing. Their attorney, Robert Wirth; the attorney for Apple Bank,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Citibank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cohen v. Lincoln Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Spielman v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Druso v. Bank One of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Pellicio v. Hartford Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Jaybar Realty Corp. v. ArmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016