Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. Howard County Sheriff's Department

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 29, 1993No. 1086, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOOM, Judge.

In this case we are asked to determine whether certain “Nazi-like” comments and behavior of Major Donald Pruitt and Sergeant Dennis Pruitt, officers of the Howard County Sheriffs Department, were protected speech under the First Amendment. We are also asked to consider whether the officers were denied procedural due process and equal protection under the law when their punishment for misconduct resulted in the termination of their employment. We find no error in, and therefore affirm, the judgment of the Circuit Court for Howard County that affirmed the decision of the Sheriff of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kevin Tindle v. Lou Caudell, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Little Rock City of Little Rock, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Pappas v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Purohit v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Brian Bresnahan v. City of St. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  5. (1997), Maryland Attorney General Reports1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API