Legal Opinion

(1997)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided October 2, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Mayor Grimes:

You have requested our opinion on the law governing recusal of a member of the Board of Aldermen for the City of Frederick who is a decision maker in a quasi-judicial proceeding. Specifically, you ask if the member is required to recuse himself or herself, to quote your letter, "from participating in any discussion, consideration, deliberation and vote on a matter on which the public official has already publicly stated his or her opinion and decision in advance of hearing the facts and evidence in the case." You also ask if the Board of Aldermen has the authority to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. In Re J. P. Linahan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Cinderella Career and Finishing Schools, Inc., Stephen Corporation, Vincent Melzac v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API