Legal Opinion

Smith v. Burkhart

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2026No. L-26-00200Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Smith v. Burkhart,

2026-Ohio-3413.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Nasear L. Smith Court of Appeals No. L-26-00200 Relator v. Derek C. Burkhart DECISION AND JUDGMENT Respondent Decided: September 1, 2026 ***** Nasear L. Smith, pro se. Derek Burkhart, pro se. ***** SULEK, J. {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the petition of relator Nasear L. Smith, a pro se inmate, for a writ of mandamus compelling respondent Derek C. Burkhart, the Warden Assistant for the Toledo Correctional Institution, to comply with R.C. 149.43, Ohio public records…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Rocker v. Guernsey County Sheriff's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Zidonis v. Columbus State Community CollegeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Wickensimer v. BartlesonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Kerr v. Pollex (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API