Legal Opinion
State v. Stephen F.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2006No. 29,128PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Chief Justice.
{1} Child Stephen F. was convicted by a jury as a youthful offender for committing two counts of criminal sexual penetration. After his convictions, the trial court ordered a diagnostic evaluation to determine Child’s amenability to treatment. Over two months passed and the trial court had yet to conduct a dispositional hearing. Child filed a motion to dismiss, alleging that the 45-day time period set forth in the Children’s Court Rules for commencing a dispositional hearing had expired. The children’s court denied the motion because it determined that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. MunizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Walker v. WaltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SmallwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- H-B-S Partnership v. Aircoa Hospitality Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Pincheira v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RaelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.