Legal Opinion
Bullock v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 1998No. 95-CF-395, 95-CF-692PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Jay Bullock was convicted by a jury of one count of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance and one count of unlawful possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (“PWID”). At the same trial, appellant Kenneth V. Rawlinson was convicted of one count of PWID. 1 All charges relate to a quantity of heroin that was stashed beside a tree near the comer of Georgia Avenue and Otis Place, N.W. Bullock contends that (A) the evidence was insufficient to convict him of distribution and PWID, (B) in any event he cannot remain convicted of both…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- ALONZO R. VAUGHN and CARL S. MORTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Timberlake v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Stevenson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Millard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.