Legal Opinion

Crary v. Coffin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1928No. 21211. Department TwoPublished

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

Plaintiff instituted an action against Florence A. Coffin, as executrix of the estate of E. A. Coffin, deceased, to recover the sum of $3,917.10, alleged to be the balance due for legal services performed for E. A. Coffin. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and upon entry of judgment in conformity therewith, this appeal was taken. Since the perfection of the appeal, the executrix died and there has been substituted, as party defendant, the administratrix with the will annexed of the estate of E. A. Coffin, to wit: Clara A. Piper.

It is urged that the court erred in failing to grant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lydon v. Exchange National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Pinell v. RoppoWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API